signs

Google Translate is also pretty good for translating text on signs through that photo functionality (sometimes the english is a bit rough, but still totally usable).

News articles mentioning the phrase were exactly what Jensen claimed would have appeared if the signs existed, and whose absence he claimed proved the non-existence of these signs.

But you're absolutely right that in general, copy-and-pasting and code generation are signs that you are doing bad things.

He said that believing that No Irish Need Apply Signs existed was the Irish equivalent of believing in leprechauns.

There should be a law that requires motorists to salute bicyclists as they blow through stop signs.

Here's what the signs look like for those interested, most appear to be from London.

A surveillance system that not only encrypts the video, but also digitally signs it, so James Bond-style thieves can't switch cameras.

Given what has been shared so far, there's enough signs pointing that the chances are pretty high they did something wrong.

If the signs did not exist, it is delusional to say they were common.

I've received similar emails, some of which showed obvious signs of automation (wrong name or remaining template variables).

Like, they didn't know how to escape/replace percent signs or print differently?

Over the sub-sample for which the pairs have the opposite signs (i.e.

Jensen: "No other ethnic group complained about being singled out by comparable signs." How on Earth did anyone take this man seriously?

It's especially baffling because he accepts that newspaper ads saying "no irish need apply" were common, but that the signs on the buildings did not exist.

Until they actually have a serious plan for solving these issues, i'm just going to look forward to the lawn signs saying "80 volts is the new 120".

) And I see no signs the establishment GOP is truly interested in cutting "medicare/Medicaid/welfare", however much they might talk about cutting the latter two.