sides

It's super easy to poke holes in both sides of the argument because building a car is so damn complicated whether it's an ICE or electric.

He's constantly posting pictures of the band hauling instruments up and down mountain sides, through rain forests, etc.

If you're going to be paranoid about shills, astroturfing, and misinformation, at least be paranoid on all sides.

Do you have any conclusive evidence that the laws 'protected' both sides in a superior manner than Uber does?

The question is whether or not both sides are committed to the relationship, willing to hear the other's side, empathize with it, and make the changes necessary to improve it.

Full on cyber war is really unlikely as both sides would prefer to stay in power.

It's pretty common for both sides to occasionally slag the other, though it seems less now than say a decade ago.

This is a really important issue from all sides- technological, business, ethical, and more.

I don't think I'll switch sides and time soon, but if I did it would be to nihilism.

It's interesting how it's impossible to choose language without also choosing political sides.

The result is that we have to pay both sides: pay the government, then pay (gargantuan sums!) out of our own pockets for things like tuition and health care.

They also accepted deposits from the Nazis, but I can understand their attitude of not taking sides.

After reading [0] and [1], is it not possible to admit that maybe both sides have some genuine "sorries" to pass around?

Supposing you're the idiot who wrote that article you linked, the whole "I take no sides" thing is called the middle ground fallacy.

Archimedes in "Measurement of the circle" wrote: The area of any circle is equal to a right-angled triangle in which one of the sides about the right angle is equal to the radius, and the other to the circumference, of the circle.