shows

There are many excellent current television shows, along with lots of bad shows.

The reason is that it shows very real world performance results.

The graphic shows the twitter bird in a freefall, but what's actually happening is the public markets traders worst nightmare, the bird is just flying straight on.

Aptitude testing shows[1] that while females tend to cluster more towards the average, male populations produce more outliers.

So on paper it shows 5-10 years experience, but in reality they still have about 3-6 months experience.

No, it shows that that individual is capable of sticking something difficult out through the long term.

This is a great textbook that shows you how matrices are defined from fields, etc… (i.e.

Employees have shift schedules which can vary from week to week and employers get burned when shifts are busted (no-shows).

How much advertising did one sit through to watch ye olde quality shows of yore?

You have failed to demonstrate that the quality of television shows has declined over time.

The difference is that the only old shows that people remember are the good ones; all the old dross is forgotten, whereas with current TV it's there for all to see.

It shows the results to the google.com query but gives badges to results based on which governments appear to be censoring them.

Googling around shows I'm certainly not the only person using the term "USian".

"if you can show a active github profile with clean code that shows you are pro-active or a expert in stack or domain, why would "they" not atleast contact you back." Because you're older, or a minority, or female...

Shows how narrow-minded this line of work has made me, I guess.