seurat

Disagree - Seurat had first mover advantage with single cell but sucked with larger datasets that Scanpy could handle till the big change in Seurat 5.

Whether George Seurat would have a copyright claim is not as clear but it seems pretty intuitive that the result is a derivative of the photo.

I mean methods of splicing together Multi-Sphere images (MSI) like Google's Seurat Light Field tech.

That said, Seurat is better documented for sure, but the ecosystem for both is incredibly rich and flourishing.

I wish there was better operability between the scverse stuff and Seurat, but Seurat went their own way from SCE/bioconductor so that's probably not going to happen.

Those atlases were established back when Scanpy and Seurat were relatively beta and were still fighting out the tool space.

There was no cubism before Picasso and Braque, or pointillism before Seurat and Signac.

Les Poseuses Ensemble by Georges Seurat was sold for $149m.

Hybrid natural language + R for Seurat annotation 5.

He was hanging with Seurat and Toulouse-Lautrec and Gaugin.

I threw the Seurat thing in as sort of a preemptive rebuttal to the idea that the Art Institute would hype up the Waves just because it has them.

There are some good packages for single cell analysis: We use "Seurat".

"Translate this photo into the style of George Seurat".

Seurat knew a lot about dots -- but seriously, the resolution is pretty impressive.

The Waves at the Art Institute aren't their most iconic, popular pieces; that honor probably goes to Seurat's Sunday Afternoon.

Seurat paints with points, Hemingway writes in short sentences, Hitchcock shoots train scenes and dutch angles.