sciences

Women had enormous trouble entering those fields (and, in fact, are almost as well represented in the physical sciences).

Luckily, some philosophy doesn't compete with the formal sciences because it operates outside of their remit; e.g.

Academic sciences also have large gender disparities; physics has very few women, while biology has lots.

Maybe that's why some people study the liberal arts and sciences and go on to write entire volumes on these sorts of topics.

I know some people in the life sciences who were strongly encouraged to get Titan time.

So, I originally argued the point that progress in the physical sciences generally doesn't involve utterly canceling out previous discoveries.

The hard part here was integrating ~10 different disciplines in various sciences.

I suppose it meant more free people in the world, or rapid advancement of the sciences, or more folks becoming friends.

Certainly up until some decades ago, law and medicine carried much more prestige and influence -- and hence, power -- than math and the physical sciences.

> Academic sciences also have large gender disparities; physics has very few women, while biology has lots.

Hiring in sciences basically scales with available federal grants for research, which basically scales with the success of liberal politics.

To date YC has not shown a good understanding of the life sciences.