schmidt

At least Schmidt came out and eventually said what pretty much every company that has shareholders stands for.

And furthermore: Schmidt did not say the quote was being used out of context, despite all the publicity.

But voting shares don't matter, Page Bring Schmidt hold a majority of votes via a third class of stock.

Also worth mentioning is that Eric Schmidt resigned as CEO to make room for Page.

Many people say that Erich Schmidt quit the Apple Board of Directors because of iPhone/Android competition, but this application suggests another reason.

You don't get through college or even a PhD as Schmidt has (where you write many papers) by repeatedly making ambiguity mistakes like these.

I don't think what Eric Schmidt said is good, but could have been better.

I think Schmidt is blaming the victims and advocating an inhuman degree of conformity.

Imagine a case where Google's business tanks, shareholders wish to oust Larry Page, Larry & Sergey obviously won't budge, but activist shareholders manage to get Eric Schmidt on board.

Looking at the numbers [1], I was wrong in remembering that Eric Schmidt (46M votes) + all class A shares (280M votes) could outvote the founders (460M votes total).

Eric Schmidt said in an interview about chromeOS that google's goal is to improve user experience on the Internet as a whole; google's revenues are directly correlateable with total hours spent on the Internet.

Eric Schmidt used to say: "Our goal is to have more at-bats per unit of time and effort than anyone else in the world."

The classic "if you've done nothing wrong" attitude is more a personal opinion of certain individuals (a certain Eric Schmidt comes to mind) than intrinsic to Google culture.

Those with nothing to hide can't always see into the future Mr Schmidt.

I don't know all of Schmidt's areas of expertise are but I doubt it includes English.

There is an undeniable style difference between MCA/Wasserman and Google/Schmidt.