priorities

Just because you don't value those priorities doesn't mean others do not.

Don't assume that a busy lifestyle means 'overwork' - I just have different priorities.

In each case, the better interface is determined not by objective analysis but by the user's priorities.

True, but in the case that a small child or animal was trapped under that panel your priorities would change significantly.

And such poor management and priorities support that this isn't merely a lifecycle issue.

There's something more interesting going on underneath the surface arguments; values and priorities.

A decade later, my perspective has widened and my priorities have shifted.

I think this shift in priorities is revealing and goes beyond a mere obsession with supermaneuverability.

And yes, we discussed moving to git every so often, but it always was lower on my priorities than new features.

As a former startup CEO, I think Jason pointed some really good pointers on priorities and what it takes to make it.

I'm sure he'll still love his dog, but no doubt his priorities will change.

Sadly, usually people who are busy working on a startup that will have failed within the next year, hopefully leaving them with time to think about life priorities.

That's actually a pretty strong argument for many of the "functional fixedness tests" to be invalid, because they don't account for peoples' priorities.

Yeah, I don't really think of people with different priorities as "ignorant".

Soylent just screams "misplaced priorities" at me.

Some people do things others consider bad not explicitly to be evil or for personal gain but because they "don't see the problem so why not?" or because they are focused on other priorities and are either simply unaware or consider the problem(s) being caused elsewhere to be worth a movement toward some "greater good" by there assessment of good.