ponies

This may be especially true for companies that are not going to be unicorns, but more like my little ponies.

Despite repeated and wide-ranging (especially in Google's case) efforts to build additional businesses, both companies are from a revenue perspective one-trick ponies.

What do you think pushes companies to increase wages, rainbow ponies?

Insofar as they do have one, in my experience there's always a few bits with magical flying unicorn ponies as a requirement they'll get to in time.

Any approach that requires unobtanium is, by definition, wrong, no matter how many ponies that you think that we'd get if it worked.

Or because they've established they are one trick ponies?

One product businesses are also one trick ponies.

I'm pretty sure the competition winners are not one-trick ponies either.

And if wishes were horses, we’d all ride ponies?

Users want magical flying unicorn ponies, but short release cycles still work out better than long ones, because you can delay questionable features just a few weeks instead of a year.

$200 still is in the land of magic ponies and unicorns though.

- When you get to the on-site and have the opportunity to learn a lot more, things might not be all ponies and rainbows like you'd imagine.

Step 4: "OMG Ponies and revolution" Sir, you do not need a revolution, because it has already occured.

Ponies, rainbows and babies are "for gays and girls" seems to be the general real world attitude still.

And for those of us who would love to see systemic change, the "one-trick ponies" may be a good way forward.

"Competition winners are one-trick ponies or loners or write awful code." I encourage everyone to think critically about the data analysis itself.