picasso

On that basis Picasso scores very high, as one of the creators of abstracted figurative art.

They'd likely have the same view of Picasso if he had held himself more aloof.

You might as well break in and steal a Picasso painting from some other millionaire.

But who will be the Picasso of game development, that shall be seen.

But seeing the actual pieces in person, especially some Picasso and Pollock, is quite a different experience than seeing dinky little prints in an art book.

Amazon is acting like a Pawn Shop owner taking advantage of the guy with the original Picasso by telling him that it was a common forgery.

And when successfully executed, it plays on human perception in ways that were formerly the exclusive domain of humans – Chagall, DiChirico, Picasso – gifted with some sort of insight into that perception.

Given, I greatly prefer Van Gogh to Picasso and Matisse, it's probably just as likely his mental state were an influence of his art, not the whole loneliness thing.

Tell that to a mathematician who would rather compare his process and functionality to that of Picasso or Rembrandt painting, Mozart composing, than that of the self serve pay station at your local grocers.

Somebody would have to pay for them - obviously that's possible but lets see how: Pasteurization is an invention - the patent system is at least as flawed as Marx's theories Creating GMail - software patents QED Picasso - work of art, copyrights, again a very hot topic even now Besides is it such a central point anyway?

Great artists steal." (Steve Jobs, inspired by Picasso) Put that to good use after a visiting some true innovators at Xerox Palo Alto.

It reminds me of the Macintosh "Picasso" posters (link at bottom).

And if told that trash was painted by a certain Mr Picasso, perceptions might change rather quickly.

Picasso and Matisse were popular, social and anything but rejected or isolated (even in the beginning).

How much abstract labor time is Picasso's best work worth, compared to Matisse?