oiler

If that synfuel generation rate can be sustained, then the oiler is not needed.

Having a missile boat which can cross the pacific without an oiler is a must if we want to bring anything to the pacific.

Of course an alternative way to make this feasible for the fleet would be to build a nuclear powered oiler.

Sealift command / auxiliary force has ~30 fast support/oiler/ammunition ships total for all of USN.

I like vintage tools, but if you need an oiler now, it's hard to beat a Goldenrod.

I was on a US Navy Oiler which was getting some maintanance from the shipyard in Subic Bay, PI.

As a peak-oiler at the time I paid close attention to the run-up to $150 and the financial crisis that followed.

And here I felt he added lubrication to machinery = Oiler and my friend Eugene who's mother called him Oygen does the same.

I do wonder if any Houston Oiler fans cheer for the Tennesee Titans.

As with Healy's fire leaving the US without an icebreaker this summer, this week a grounding apparently left the US Navy without an oiler in the Middle East[1].

Squirt oiler to get stuff running smoothly again.

You're paying the union for the right to use a tunnel boring machine, and you have an oiler watching your cranes because it's still 1910 and that's a full-time position.

In terms of UI animation the most sensible thing to use is Euler Integration (pronounced "oiler").

There needs to be nuclear powered "oiler ships" that stay out at sea indefinitely and recharge passing by electric ships.

It's a shibboleth for English lit majors, like knowing Euler is "oiler" for math folks.

Not sure how an American would pronounce "oiler" but if it's "oil" as in "sunflower oil" then that's a pretty good emulation of the original German pronounciation of "Euler"...

So, to remind myself, Euler's name is pronounced more like Oiler, right?