neoclassic

Representing democratic ideals are why America chose iconography from Athens for its neoclassic buildings.

So in the end, the whole debt-drag thing is just a neoclassic platitude.

It comes from academic material, typical neoclassic economics textbooks teach this so I assume its from The Wealth of Nations.

Neoliberalism would be the bastard child of neoclassic economics and liberal ideology and it can be defined by events and people that definitely exist.

Standard neoclassic economics are full of such logical holes.

Ideally, and I would argue in most circumstances, wages are a strong approximation of the marginal revenue product, just as neoclassic theory states they should be.

I've heard historians and anti-neoclassic-economists refer back to the success of Tally Sticks(1100 - 1854), Colonial Script(1764 –– 1776), and Roman currency before they switched to a gold standard.

Orthodox neoclassic economics does tend to overly focus on supply constraints, and if you like suburbs for misguided reasons well....we're no where close to actually running out of land!

You seem to talk about Menger's view of marginalism, but Menger isn't really part of the classical branch I am talking about: he founded the Autrian School and was pretty skeptical about the neoclassic school at its time.

> it gets neo-classic economists [...] to not dismiss you as “psychologists” Lol, that's funny - I'm pretty much at the point of dismissing "fundamentalist neoclassic economists"...

I could say the same about your black and white thinking using outdated Chicago/Neoclassic economic theories when applied to aggregate economies, but I digress.

Neoclassic movement is all over the place.