naval

The risk is, if the Chinese pick a naval fight and their navy gets pummeled, it's a PR disaster.

The US is to a quite good approximation, the only naval power on the planet.

Their empire was based on supreme naval and economic dominance, which was outmoded by the natural advance of technology.

My father once complained about the hot weather making his work at the naval shipyard unbearable.

It's not what China would pay to have its naval fleets traverse the canal, it's what China would pay to have a legitimate-sounding reason to have its naval fleet stationed at either end.

Greece has land that would hold a Russian military base or airfield or naval base.

It's one thing to read a naval map, another thing entirely to captain a ship.

Every major power has surveillance satellites specifically designed for keeping track of naval fleets.

It's weird how they compare China's (hypothetical) desire for a naval military presence in the Atlantic to the USA's presence in the Pacific.

Unless they're going to swim or row, those 700 million humans who could fight if needed don't do much in a naval war.

In the 1970s, about 1100 people were forcibly removed after the British government took control of the island for the US naval base.

I imagine Marines will be deployed at least on Naval vessels with combat or combat support missions.

China is probably the country of the planet with more "naval muscle" in fact.

It depends on what we call "naval power".

From top of the Tor Project's "Who uses Tor?" page: "Tor was originally designed, implemented, and deployed as a third-generation onion routing project of the Naval Research Laboratory.[0] It was originally developed with the U.