marksmanship

There will still be a need for marksmanship training but this enables the minimum standard of marksmanship for its user to be akin to an expert.

The rest being my utterly trivial-in-comparison training in martial arts, marksmanship, and other survival and combat skills?

You're overestimating the marksmanship/ability to use firearms of the average (untrained) person, especially when under extreme stress.

They have argued and lost because the big picture military only cares about PT tests, marksmanship, and hair cuts.

But to say that Kaggle is not machine learning is to say: paintball requires no marksmanship.

Range marksmanship can translate to real-world scenarios for sighted shooters, but it doesn't seem like it would for blind shooters.

Even granted that he's a lefty gun-grabber, what does he have against technology that improves marksmanship?

And there's basically three mechanisms for that, only one of which is reasonably guaranteed to work with normal human marksmanship.

Man, most modern blockbuster games require marksmanship skills way beyond what '80s games ever demanded.

HQ, get out of politics altogether and return to its original marksmanship etc.

Training in marksmanship was inadequate; training in verbal de-escalation was almost nonexistent.

Triple-A FPS games that actually have players that require marksmanship?

Well, in this case, I meant "well-trained in marksmanship", but your point is valid.

Your equaling of “well-trained police” with “police marksmanship” is a bit frightening.

Marksmanship is a simple thing that takes a lot of focus.

Marksmanship is all about developing skill with practice.