lenders

Yes, banks can get into trouble if its lenders call at an inconvenient time, but so can biz.

Insikt was born out of our realization that banks will not be the lenders of tomorrow – brands will.

And traditional lenders might be hesitant to give loans to a very young organization with few assets.

What will happen when the next downturn arrives, and lenders get hit with massive losses?

There were very few bad loans left on the books of European lenders, everyone was clean, no bad actors at all.

Yes, that's another important role - bringing together lenders and borrowers, for a fee.

There are for more debtors in my family than there are lenders.

But capitalism cannot work that way, when lenders make a bad loan they're supposed to take the losses, that's how interest rates are set.

So yes, so far, only one side (lenders) has taken losses.

No, shorting mortgage-backed securities doesn't cause losses for mortage lenders.

Which meant basically free capital for investments which were inherently risky, with credit lenders (banks and non-banks) getting money thrown at them for yield, just some yield.

Like, hey let the guys off the hook for part of their debt (lenders knew the risk...), and let the blow generate economic pressure for growth (e.g.

His over-the-top rhetoric and calling his own lenders "terrorists" is what's wrong with the world, not what's right.

"While we never made a subprime loan and are not predatory lenders, we think a lot of homeowners have been victimized," Mr.

If one looks at it that way, the whole argument about "lenders chose to lend to them, taking risk that they might not be able to pay, therefore they are to blame as well", falls wayside.

Lenders will probably take a hit since a lot of people were playing with borrowed money.

Lenders see their balance sheets looking better and better as their debtors' equity increases, so they can lend more and at lower interest rates.

Lenders need to assess credit and interest rate risk.