kevlar

Sure you could hunt with it, but it'd be kind of pointless unless there are deer wearing kevlar.

It's a lot thicker (like those dog attack suits) and often have steel or kevlar plates in the inside.

It's a bit like responding to knife or gun crime by saying everyone should wear kevlar vests, problem solved!

I believe the first is that it is more elastic than kevlar, allowing it to more easily absorb the impact of a bullet and spread the load.

I think the best solution is to use pneumatic tires with a Kevlar liner built into the tire casting.

Never ever take the road for granted, even wearing Kevlar gear and a full-faced helmet; still no match for any steel framed vehicle.

You only really need to wear kevlar in Oakland by the way.

Just be sure to wear your kevlar when you leave the compound.

At least kevlar seem to be in the same ballpark.

Also, replace the rubber belts with kevlar belts for precision.

If we are manufacturing, say, kevlar vests in 2001, we may very well interpret a large order as representing an underlying demand shift.

Tldr its stronger than kevlar they say Cool!

The military probably is interested in "kevlar or better", which spider silk itself promises but has so far proved to be elusive.

I kept looking for what exactly made it "bomb-proof" in the product description, but saw no mention of any plating or kevlar or anything, so it seems like a suspicious claim.

Cyclists also have less protective gear (Kevlar padding, body armor, leather, less protective helmet).

Kevlar, nylon and those such things come to mind as designed from chemistry up - miracles of the chemistry of the '50s & 60s.

In many parts of the flats, you'll wish for your Kevlar.