kagan

Chief Justice John Roberts, Justice Sonia Sotomayor, Kagan and Alito seemed most comfortable talking about the technology.

It seemed like party insiders liked Kagan because she was an insider, but that was all.

Roberts and Kagan are the only justices I haven't found an example of where they were lone dissenters.

Still not clear how Kagan violated free speech by not saying much.

That quote at the end from Kagan is just utterly damning.

Noah Kagan has some good blog posts on this too.

New Justice Elena Kagan usually votes with those three.

I liked the Noah Kagan interview, which was also popular here.

Justices Breyer, Roberts, Kennedy, Ginsburg, Sotomayor and Kagan were the majority.

I think when Kagan talks about the same outcome, she means Aereo and a cable company are both third parties that deliver content from the broadcasters to you over a wire for pay.

I'm strongly in agreement with Justice Kagan on this one.

Justice Kagan noted that what makes Amazon special is that they have a better inventory control system than their competitors, and it is very important for them to know where everything is.

That's what disturbs everyone." >Justice Elena Kagan noted that "from a user's perspective, it's exactly the same as if I'm watching cable.

I suggest you read Robert Kagan's "Dangerous Nation".

Kagan is suggesting that the outcome is what the law was trying to regulate, and so the mechanism used to achieve that outcome is not important.

Later, in response to a question from Justice Kagan, he admits that a reasonable security officer could have made these decisions motivated purely by security considerations alone.

Email people, and search Noah Kagan's tips on Youtbue.