sotomayor

It's a shell game, and it's good to see Sotomayor is smart enough to see it.

An idea that both Alito and Sotomayor share common ground on can't possibly be as simple as the picture you present.

There's another that's gaining traction, put forth by Justice Sotomayor in US v.

Justices Breyer, Roberts, Kennedy, Ginsburg, Sotomayor and Kagan were the majority.

I haven't read the full Sotomayor transcript, but this overall quote exists in the context of a debate about whether corporations are allowed political free speech, and I have some strong guesses about which side Sotomayor is on.

>So maybe we should be happy that Justice Sotomayor has no clue how a Roku box works.

These sorts of databases can be mined retroactively to discover all sorts of sensitive information, similar to what was pointed out by Justice Sotomayor in the recent GPS tracking case, U.

It's hard not to sympathize with the folks who have been saying all along that Sotomayor is an extremist, in light of her views in this case, which was an 8-1 decision.

I might be suffering from listening to too small a sample (though they were right...), but I heard much more positive commentary about Sotomayor before she was confirmed than Kagan.

As someone who thought Sotomayor would be awful on civil liberties due to being a prosecutor, it's worth noting that she's been one of the best in that regard (IMO) since joining the court.

I see you are an attorney, so I'll skip the detailed explanation of vertical stare decisis and simply point out that Sotomayor joined Scalia's opinion in Jones, which commanded a majority and was the opinion of the Court.

I can't imagine how the Justice Sotomayor could have been any more clear in this issue: I would not assume that all information voluntarily disclosed to some member of the public for a limited purpose is, for that reason alone, disentitled to Fourth Amendment protection.

“It may be necessary to reconsider the premise that an individual has no reasonable expectation of privacy in information voluntarily disclosed to third parties,” Sotomayor wrote in 2012 Sotomayor gets it.

Jones: '“It may be necessary to reconsider the premise that an individual has no reasonable expectation of privacy in information voluntarily disclosed to third parties,” Sotomayor wrote in 2012.

Chief Justice John Roberts, Justice Sonia Sotomayor, Kagan and Alito seemed most comfortable talking about the technology.

In my humble opinion, everyone is wrong in this article - Sotomayor, Butler, Marshall.

Nobody issues this diatribe about Sonia Sotomayor, and she went to Yale.