jurors

Allow jurors to discuss the case while the trial is ongoing.

You describe the problems of obtaining a conviction - proving lack of consent beyond a reasonable doubt such that jurors will return a guilty verdict.

Just like they removed all jurors who wouldn't consider the death penalty from the Boston bomber trial.

And the frequent charitable donations Samsung makes to causes in Marshall, TX, home of many of the the court's jurors.

Supreme Court (William Rehnquist at this time) was sworn in to preside, and the senators were sworn in as jurors.

Allow jurors to take notes during trial and provide them with a full trial transcript.

The questionnaire given to potential jurors asked for their beliefs on the death penalty.

Consciously or not, it's designed to have jurors decide based on their gut instincts instead of on the fine details of the case.

Is it common for both jurors to be dismissed in such a case?

The most important point is that it affects public perception, which will potentially skew the jurors' thoughts in the actual lawsuits against Uber/others.

Sounds a lot like a grand jury stuffed with hand-picked jurors.

In my limited experience, I think providing the jurors with a full transcript of the trail might make the most positive influence.

That means the 18 jurors heard evidence, asked questions, weighed whether the charges merit a trial, then voted on the indictments – all at the average rate of one case every 52 seconds…".

Some of the jurors who convicted her were "dismayed": > “Life in prison?

"Check them off," she told jurors in her closing statement.

Figures provided to jurors show the bank has made a modest $123,000 in servicing fees on the loans." And while you do a good job quoting the prosecutors theory about the bank, it's worth repeating that the jury disagreed pretty thoroughly.

Jurors probably aren't experts in rhetoric so such statements have a huge influence on them.