jets

The problem is, before, you had to convince and train enough people to fly jets and kill.

Having lots of big jets flying 75% empty would mean much higher ticket prices overall.

It's a jet engine, although normal jets have to have elaborate turbine-compressor thingys to do the air compression.

They don't have the big generators and high voltage DC power systems that the newer jets have.

It would still cost at least $250k-1m to install a similar system in GA and business jets.

Except where Goliath is the largest, most powerful military in the world with nukes and fighter jets.

So, it's becoming abundantly clear that vehicle companies (autos, jets...) have approximately zero knowledge how to hire software engineers.

The number of people who own their own jets, multiple vacation houses, and have paid staff to manage their affairs?

They could've upgraded the whole military with next-gen rifles, IR, Playstations, and so on plus some new jets at these prices.

That approach has the downside that you can't have water jets or multiple layers of caves with lakes above each other.

But full-size jets that look just like 787s don't land at boeing field every day.

Which entire meta-categories of horrific errors do you ascribe to software development for jets?

Smaller airports are served by small "commuter airlines" today, not big empty jets.

Axe says "The two jets would be playing the roles of opposing fighters in a pretend air battle, which the Air Force organized specifically to test out the F-35’s prowess as a close-range dogfighter in an air-to-air tangle".