idris

The idea is, whatever rust cannot guarantee an idris-to-rust transpiler can.

As such it is in the same space as Curry-Howard based programming languages like Idris and Agda with dependent types.

You have a language like Idris create a DSL that targets the machine you want.

What I like about rust is how I think it will go together really well with a language like idris.

Whilst Idris usage may increase, I doubt it will make up for Haskell's head start.

Whilst Idris is pretty cool, I think it's a long way from production use.

What about Rust and Idris make them go together?

In the future I hope to be able to recommend Idris as well.

Maybe the next wave will have some sml/haskell/idris.

There are very few executables written in Idris (and even fewer that aren't bit-rotted), the build tooling and package management are very simple, the runtime is heavily optimized, concurrent or parallel (like GHC's) and the single-threaded performance is far from Rust's.

> Idris is not only strict by default, but has an even more advanced type system, and because of that it will probably overtake Haskell eventually.

I certainly upvote the better job ads and assumed everybody else did, and if you want an Idris research job, you'll probably be searching for the keyword rather than browsing top results.

Idris is the very minimum to even start, and even that doesn't even begin to scratch temporal logic.

There is a whole spectrum of static typing richness, from dynamic typing to well beyond Idris.

Agda, Idris) that can give full specifications of their own programms, are experimental, not mainstream.