hairless

Is there some evidence that the hairless trait was the result of human selection and no hairless varieties existed before human selection?

This is an inevitable consequence of the fact that science depends on a bunch of hairless bipedal monkeys for its existence.

I can imagine setting up a program to breed other hairless apes and ruthlessly select for intelligence.

Except the part where KittenDelivery tweeted some hairless kittens -- those are creepy.

If hairless monkeys can evolve to do this, why not dung beetles?

Then, he claims we don't know where the domestic pig came from, and that a common ancestor could be hairless.

I'm a not-terribly-bright mostly-hairless ape, but I can understand the basics of natural selection.

Well, the hairless monkeys running around right now don't seem to be doing a good job of things, maybe it is time to try something new.

Pr0n images have to be hairless otherwise guys are staring at a wool rug or whatever, and now women in general want to try to match that.

The tribe of intelligent, hairless, miniature purple cats that you will come to associate closely with after several weeks with minimal sleep will help you get by.

It's the human-selected, domestic pig that is hairless.

OSX 10.6: Hairless Hypoallergenic Domestic House Cat.

"...or the actual flesh-and-blood hairless apes who are dozing off in the seminar room while you speak." Wow.

It isn't a big leap to imagine a debate between aliens about whether the hairless apes on the third rock from Sol should be considered "sentient", or merely clever animals.

Honey Badgers are great, such vicious fighters that lions basically think "I'll leave that for another day" - the animal kingdom's equivalent of short hairless Glaswegian pub landlords.

First of all, we are not "hairless monkeys".

Hairless skin on the hands and face has blood vessels close to the surface, and cooling those parts is proposed to quickly cool your blood and core temperature.