grammatical

In short, grammar rules are constraints that have to unify in order to describe a grammatical utterance, instead of phrase-structure rules that generate sentences.

Syntactic theories aim to explain why particular sentences are grammatical or ungrammatical (in the judgments of native speakers).

One other grammatical feature borrowed from Chinese is the way of asking and answering yes-no questions.

Ships are conventionally female in British English, so are cars in some circles, but there is nothing grammatical about it.

Things that are sufficiently important to us are anthopomorphized and this a social and cultural process rather than a strictly grammatical one.

If you can accurately do that, then yes, you've put each word into one category (as far as making up grammatical sentences).

They participate in the grammatical structure of English in exactly the same way.

I've found several typos and other grammatical issues, and I'd love to be able to provide quick fixes for them.

The grammatical basics seem a lot like Chinese, with similar word order, and a couple Japanese-esque particles thrown in (li ≈ が, e ≈ を).

There are numerous grammatical issues that instantly reduce your credibility.

Riddled with grammatical errors, this piece makes me chuckle.

Oh, correcting grammatical mistakes is worth downvotes now?

It is perfectly grammatical if "brick" is taken to be a verb.

As I said above, the "the" overlays onto the grammatical structure after the "a" does.

The "the" overlays onto the "all", "-s", or "a" to change the grammatical structure.

I also said if "part of speech" is defined as being in the grammatical structure of languages, then "the" doesn't have a part of speech -- I was reinforcing the first point I made.