grammar

The grammar is basically useless without the lexer, which is very complex, full of weird corner cases, and changes version by version.

His essay more about style rather than grammar, which means it's not really taking part in the (de- vs pre-)scriptivist debates in the first place.

If anything having all the grammar rules already spelled out means another implementation can just reuse them, there are bison-like tools for almost any language.

And much of it, in both the lexer and the grammar rules, is very heavily tied into MRI internals.

To reduce errors, you do need to be really careful to use short, complete sentences with simple and correct grammar.

You're doing well, it was just someone being a grammar stickler for no good reason.

Honestly, it's like asking people not to write spelling or grammar mistakes in documentation.

All dictionaries, grammar processing, image processing, DNN - the whole stack runs on phone.

This grammar of graphics plotting library really seems to gold standard of plotting.

Sorry, I didn't mean to start a grammar war.

I work here because I get to learn about my practice (as well as my failing grammar skills) every day.

Bad grammar and poor language, complicated descriptions of simple things, focusing on unimportant parts - are huge telltales of problems in a person's thinking.

Some common problems I've seen with resumes: - Grammar, spelling and formatting problems.

(Or, alternatively, nobody fixes it up and the business ends up making bad decisions based on garbage data that came from a spreadsheet that's a disorganized mess.) Edit: Grammar.