friendship

That does not mean that they do not care about other people or that they do not crave friendship and relationships.

There are non-sexual relationships among long-term (grand-) mother/daughter and friendship-based dyads who deserved those positive rights.

I don't see why it's material whether this reason was friendship/status-boosting or some sort of tangible, cash benefit.

Since humans largely prefer the muscle, it forms the basis for a lovely friendship.

What I found is that people have very little motivation to meet strangers for the purpose of friendship.

It is bad for the friendship, bad for the company and you don't know what hole this might leave the guy with.

So you're actually seriously considering ruining your business and your friendship for her?

I do not feel that there will ever be any real friendship between these two countries.

No disrespect is meant, just fond memories of a too-short friendship.

But treachery is more or less just any underhandedness, it isn't necessarily a betrayal of a normative trust like family or friendship or even business obligations.

But then again, maybe I have an old-fashioned concept of friendship and caring.

The rivalry was fierce but so was the friendship.

Peace and "friendship" between states is a political construct, built strictly out of political will, the rest is nationalist bullshit.

Friendship is sort of its ultimate form, so it makes sense that an electronic medium for friendship is the heaviest "tracker" on the internet.

You cannot equate friendship between individual humans and "friendship" between nation-states.

Are their "friends" there for the friendship or for the money?