ethno-religious

If one ethno-religious group gets the majority over another, the losing group doesn't see the government as legitimate.

It's Jewish colonists that invaded a land to build an ethno-religious state that excludes the natives.

So, I think I'm on pretty stable ground calling the likely resultant two state solution an ethno-religious solution.

There is nothing inevitable about strategically moronic war, a super power supporting an ethno-religious genocide, and an orange dildo ripping up international order.

Israel is not only jews, israel represents genocidal ethno-religious fascist state backed by fascist zionists factions: christian, jewish, secular.

It just sounds like a poorly managed housing development with a HOA that selects for political bent rather than ethno-religious (as the original HOAs were used).

I guess I should amend my comment to say theocratic ethno-nationalist / ethno-religious states, but I am likely messing up my greek/Plato (?) here.

Besides Belgium (and that’s nowhere close) there are hardly any successful democracies that were evenly split primarily on ethno-religious grounds and didn’t entirely collapse on the first opportunity.

I believe that there is sufficient evidence for the argument that Israeli Arab citizens do indeed live under apartheid, mainly due to the ethno-religious nature of citizenship in Israel proper.

And the reason I'm bothering to write such a long-ass reply at all is because there is currently far too much intolerance and ethno-religious hatred being propogated and spread around the world.

Of course there are two populations that differ in religion and ethnicity- although Judaism is a culture as well as a religion, Jews are at the same time an ethno-religious group, accepting almost no converts, and mix of multiple ethnicities bound by a common cultural heritage.

Ethno-religious extremists with better PR.