encrypted

The data is not being encrypted in a standard way.

If they create a scraper then it means they have to store the password (encrypted) and then decrypt it so the scraper can use it?

It works if what you upload is already encrypted, which is the case here...

IP camera, sheeva plug, and encrypted recording to an overseas server?

How I understand this, for this system to work, all data on the server needs to be encrypted with the same key.

We can't even be sure what they're really doing because we cannot audit the software nor can we audit the encrypted communications.

Leaving aside the tangent in your comment (we were talking about governments having access to your encrypted data, not about Free Software)...

I want to give everyone free, unlimited and encrypted cloud storage with the help of donations from the community to keep things going.

I can also offer expertise in API design and worked closely with Apple to figure out the best approach to making FairPlay encrypted frameworks.

If someone wants encrypted calls today it does the job but it will soon be merged into TextSecure (guessing the name will change to Signal like on iOS).

It's my first choice for an encrypted conversation.

But much of my activity is spread out over many networks, and is encrypted in ways that may still not be super-convenient for the NSA to constantly crack.

The government having full access to the contents of your encrypted drive is an "inconvenience"?

Because localStorage and sync storage in Chrome is not sandboxed or encrypted, the blocked list would be "in the open" to other extensions.

Indeed it means that I "trust" the NSA (and local Dutch agencies conscripted by them) with any data that I send or receive that is not strongly encrypted.

> Because...sync storage in Chrome is not sandboxed or encrypted, the blocked list would be "in the open" to other extensions.