econ

And anyone who's gotten beyond econ 101 knows that these black-and-white conceptions of the econ 101 capitalism have little to do with modern economic discourse or policy.

You could use a think tank or econ phd position to research policies with potential for disruptive change.

Any econ major knows that you can't have monetary union without either fiscal union or prudent governments.

If you're fanatically obsessed with defending a econ 101 definition of capitalism: sure, you got him.

Anybody that's interested in political economy, but has a more traditional Econ 101 background, it's a good place to start.

If you think deflation is good for liquidity, you are missing econ 101 knowledge.

Any Econ 101 student can tell you the answer: The higher wage reduces the quantity of labor demanded, and hence leads to unemployment.

Glad to see companies finally getting onboard with this kind of pricing model and system, which has been around for years (econ 101).

This is really an excellent piece, no wonder he's an econ professor at one of the most prestigious university in the world, that guy is brilliant.

That is the problem with most econ 101 models.

> It's useful in life to actually think things through, rather than parrot phrases you've heard in econ 101.

Your list reads like a wide-eyed econ grad.

I read epic flamefests on nntp://sci.econ during the last 20 years and that is the only reason I "got it".

You remind me of the guy I had in an econ class who said, "I don't understand why people hate airport security so much.

My anecdotal experience is that most may start with math for their first degree, but then (or during) pivot to some related but more applied area like CS, Econ, etc.

(And there are probably exceptions: industries massive enough that virtually every part is commoditized.) That said, as an Econ/Business major, I appreciated his analysis.

Location:Ohio Remote:Yes Willing to relocate: Yes Technologies: Business major, Econ/Acct graduating May 2016.