disobedience

Which is why allowing them to undertake acts of civil disobedience is just letting in the Visigoths.

Also a weaker point might be that civil disobedience itself could be considered immoral [in some moralities].

They don't participate in acts of civil disobedience in a suicidal effort to protect our privacy!?

Straight civil disobedience (unpermitted live work) also happens, but doing it at the scale needed would be a bit more challenging.

There seems to be a false idea in our country that civil disobedience demands martyrdom.

Uber uses civil disobedience very well to achieve its goals and move into new territories.

Government lecturing us on proper civil disobedience is ironic to put it very mildly.

I think of civil disobedience as a way toward justice where an obvious and protracted injustice has existed.

It's very easy, civil disobedience is one of the fastest ways to change laws.

Also, while civil disobedience is laudable the same can't be said from a company.

But apparently MLK doesn't know how to do civil disobedience, and the Obama administration would rather identify with his captors than with JFK.

Following evil laws is evil Civil disobedience is appropriate for individuals, not institutions.

Somehow it doesn't seem quite like "civil disobedience" when it's a multinational company breaking the law.

Engaging in civil disobedience if you are working on such projects is the only acceptable outcome" The two people I referenced above have a deep, thoughtful, respectful disagreement.