disclosing

Disclosing sooner would have been cool, but then again law enforcement might have had the gun to their heads on disclosing anything.

The problem is that disclosing that data has social and legal consequences.

You could be liable when disclosing bugs responsibly too, as some researchers have learned when investigating voting machine security.

It's another wannabe startup that asks people to sign up before disclosing terms, or, in this case, anything at all.

It's not a dick thing to do at all unless you actively avoid disclosing it.

That's akin to James Bond's opponents always disclosing their secret master plan just before they think they're going to kill Bond.

Without committing a crime, people can make a lot for disclosing it directly and confidentially.

Hi daviross, would you mind disclosing what internet communities you pay for?

Then of course there's the whole part about disclosing company trade secrets.

The alternative is trade secret protection whereby inventors remain secretive about their work product, never disclosing to the public at large how the device works and not allowing follow-ons to build upon their knowledge.

Does anyone know if you are liable for disclosing bugs irresponsibly?

I wish they were more like Github or Stripe about disclosing this sort of information.

I'd say the "dangers to public safety" are in the disclosing-to-the-public part of the transactions.

I'm three for three on past health insurers getting hacked and disclosing everything, and have more worthless third-party "credit protection" settlements than I could possibly use (just enter your SSN!).

Disclosing an election can be rigged with all the supporting evidence is your absolute duty.