bugs

It means more code spread over more functions, which increases the probability of bugs.

These are bugs with signed integer usage, but they're not bugs caused by a decision to use signed integers, because in these cases, there was no choice.

They are fulfilling relationships, except that it bugs me how hard it is to meet face to face.

What bugs have you seen that were caused in part by the choice to use signed integers?

Every day that they don't find one, they have work that's going undone, projects that are proceeding too slowly, bugs going unfixed.

It has many bugs and still lacks many important features, such as favorites management.

I have seen bugs caused by unsigned and signed integer usage that fit into other categories, though.

His argument is that he reckons that over his career he made very few bugs that could be avoided if he had used const.

In my career I've had to implement logic to work around buggy libraries, spend time looking into bugs in others code...

There have been known bugs and vulnerabilities caused by combined characters.

While my comment was a bit glib, new features do have a tendency to introduce complexity & bugs on seemingly entirely unrelated parts of software.

Wouldn't they still be bugs with negative results in signed numbers?

What bugs me is that economic models of questionable utility are taken as gospel in politics and used as a battering ram - "because science told us to".