dining

You must be mistaken, because the Dining Philosophers example only dates back to May 2015.

There was no space for dining and the flights didn't last for days anyway.

One EPT (expense pro tip?) -- usually the dining programs associated with airlines work by registering existing cards with your account (and thus FF#).

I would have to spent hours working either from my bed, my dining table or in a coffee, on a laptop.

The bottom line is that the charging station in question was in a safe populated area with plenty of dining an entertainment options near by.

Do you take this position when dining at a restaurant?

The dining philosophers example definitely runs destructors and frees memory.

I've been a fine-dining chef for years and recently left my restaurant to build a business around my love of Japanese knives.

I worked at Stanford in the dept which supported housing and dining.

Process videos, use videos in fine-dining restaurants, etc.

Large crews, cabins, dining space, everything.

If you want a nice car, a condo, laptop/smartphone, nice dining room set, etc., you're going to have put some hours in.

To paraphrase what I remember of the original comment, it was "I stopped using Rust when I got to the Dining Philosophers chapter of the book and found that it taught newcomers to leak memory like crazy, via a bug that has gone unfixed since 2014." It contained no mention of which bug that was nor where the leaks were, hence the numerous follow-up comments asking for clarification.

" the Dining Philosophers chapter from the book which cannot exhibit the leak from that issue because it doesn't define any destructors (let alone define any potentially-panicking destructors, let alone attempt to catch any panics, all of which would be required to observe such a leak)." Since when can memory leaks only be observed from within the language itself?