dimensions

The reality is that there are many dimensions to supercomputing performance and it's impossible for one number to capture the utility of the machine.

Grid search never exhausts the search space either, at least if the dimensions are continuous.

Because the css box model defines width and height as the dimensions of the content.

I wonder what it would be like if it were possible to add new dimensions to the economy.

Watch Pi before Mr Robot!), there are multiple dimensions of conflict and they work differently (Mycroft/Sherlock, Moriarty/Sherlock, Watson/Sherlock, &c).

In particular, high dimensions can screw everything and sparsity can allow much cheaper solutions, so sometimes you just revert to gradient descent or SGD.

Collision avoidance is far easier in three dimensions than in two.

Looking at the source, the main things I see are just many hover styles being declared, with specific positions and dimensions.

One hundred thirteen facial dimensions, each presenting a different variable.

I switched to OPO from Nexus 5 and it had the perfect dimensions.

This is pretty optimistic, in quite a few dimensions...

That physical artifacts only have 3 dimensions probably makes it more difficult to introduce the sort of interconnectedness that tends to make software artifacts harder to understand.

There are multiple dimensions to what people "like/dislike" and people assign different (and hidden) weights to them.

If you're drawing a Venn Diagram of "ways to commmunicate" in two dimensions, sure.