criticality

Yeah sure, but the criticality is much less, isn't it?

The main risks in nuclear power are loss of coolant, containment breach or a prompt criticality event.

Especially as the experiments mentioned in the article were performed especially to get better data about the criticality state.

The compressed column would reach criticality and a combination of fission and fusion reactions would occur.

It's also of note that during its intended trip into criticality, it ended up detonating about a half mile from its target.

Tank storage is complicated; stratification and precipitation can cause criticality events at unpredictable moments.

If you are interested in this stuff, wikipedia has a list of criticality accidents.

In its current incarnations, it is considered uncertifiable for high criticality levels under DO-178C.

PBRs are one of several inherently safe designs wherein shutoff of circulating coolant raises core temperature and natural processes serve to choke criticality.

Ignoring the source, as I'm sure one can find criticality with that, and assume its true.

DO-178B [0] has several levels of designations for criticality of systems.

Additionally, design constraints are followed for high criticality software that simply eliminate many types of attacks - no dynamic allocation, mathematically provable static stack analysis, etc.

An amateur, acting alone, might have accidentally caused a criticality event large enough to qualify as "the first nuclear bomb".

The thing is, a lot of systems, are called "critical", or with Kauffman's words "edge of chaos", or "poised at criticality".

(iv) The probability and criticality of potential risks to electronic protected health information." 45 C.

I will be able to work on that in June." The most important thing is that my users' opinion about the criticality of things does not always match the overall picture, and I am always having to choose which tickets to postpone.

Criticality accidents are my favorite type of disaster.