coexist

Having people with deeply conflicting standards of behavior coexist in a futile attempt at a one-size-fits-all society that inherently favors one group over the other is not going to work.

It just amazes me that posts like this or documentaries about Aaron Schwartz can coexist on the frontpage with stories about the latest derivative tech company.

Ah, so they can coexist in such fashion?

But denotation doesn't override connotation, they coexist.

This way people who are committed to making a living in the sharing economy can coexist with the real independents who only participate to make a little extra coin.

Docker and Ansible can easily coexist peacefully.

Cultures can't coexist that's just not how it works, a culture is the dominant way of life in an area, you can't invite another culture to come and live within the confines of another culture, that makes no sense.

Again, that's not much different than the current system of clueless folk consulting attorneys, and I imagine both systems would coexist for some time to come.

I don't see any reason why both models can't coexist.

True, this law is unnecessary, but it's not hard to see why taxi drivers who paid for their licenses fair and square are upset At least in Chicago, Uber and cabs seem to coexist pretty well.

Except you document and do this fantastic job training but when it's all set and done, technology has moved on when the project wraps and there's already something better that can't coexist with the method you used.

I'm not talking about a way to trick the optimizer, I'm talking about a way to make an optimizer and a forced memory access coexist in a super-easy fashion, by very slightly altering the compiler.

Summary: The author reexamines his assertion that covariance and contravariance can coexist through recent advances in (sub-)typing theory by "explaining sophisticated type theoretic concepts, in simple terms and by examples, to undergraduate computer science students and/or willing functional programmers".

This entire article hinges upon this assumption - that good design cannot coexist with something designed to kill living creatures (humans included, though the article also conveniently leaves out the use of guns in hunting) - without making any attempt whatsoever to actually back this up, instead resorting to nonsense like how design is an "ethical trade".

"Or even worse, we’re told that we are being racist (Does any intelligent person actually believe a systematically oppressed demographic has the ability to oppress those in power?)" People are adding the requirement that to be racist or racism that an oppression element must coexist with the thought or behavior[1][2].