cirrus

There is also a common opinion among Cirrus owners that a number of fatal Cirrus accidents could have been avoided had the pilot deployed the chute, i.e.

I fly a Cirrus and it is not inherently more difficult or dangerous to fly then any other aircraft.

For example, to ship a new Cirrus SR20 to Australia starts at $28,995 and you'll need to wait for factory reassembly and certification.

I'd say an interesting comparison is the Cirrus SR20/22 which has a parachute for the plane.

I talked on a cell phone in a cirrus with a glass cockpit, guess what happened?

The Cirrus even has an airframe parachute for a soft landing.

What Cirrus has done is make an aircraft which brings new pilots into flying with the concept of using an aircraft like you would a car.

The Cirrus SR22 airframe parachute ensures a soft, slow landing.

Outside of most Cirrus aircraft, they're not standard.

I've met a few people who have flown the cirrus planes.

Not for nothing, but Vso (stall speed with full flaps) in the CIrrus SR22 is still 59 knots (68mph/109kmh) and remember airframes don't have the same crash safety features that automobiles do.

) Source: Pilot, skydiver, Cirrus owner.

There is a common opinion in the aviation community that several of the "saves" from the recovery chute in a Cirrus shouldn't really count.

What about the "parallel construction" scenario whereby NSA uses their alleged attack against Tor to deanonymize SR2, and the Cirrus UC is simply a construction?

I know this is in hindsight, but having watched The Matrix, I would have been distrustful of an online handle called "Cirrus".

I think most banks and building societies in the UK are on Cirrus, so get free withdrawls almost everywhere.

Cirrus has only had one or maybe a couple more legitimate saves.

Plus, a modern plane, such as a Cirrus, feels kind of like a jet with the screens, autopilot, etc.