choroid

One of them is the thickness of the choroid, a tissue layer in the back of the eye.

Sorry, but I know EndMopia believers don't know what the choroid is.

The handwavium chelates the toxins and they precipitate when the CSF drains into the bloodstream at the choroid plexus.

Your results are irrelevant and minor changes could simply be due to choroid thickness changes.

Different brain regions including external frontal cortex, cerebellar hemisphere, entorhinal cortex/hippocampus and choroid plexus contain fungal material, which is absent in brain tissue from control individuals.

Is there an explanation for why the choroid changes its thickness, and why this change would create an opposite effect in eye growth over a longer period?

The only mechanistic bit that suggests a causal relation was that HCV indeed appeared in the brain (well, the choroid plexus) and may have triggered a local immune response.

Proving axial elongation is reversible is not done by a n=1 pet theory forum post measured in a home lab by someone who doesn't know what their choroid is.

That Alzheimer's develops slowly supports the view that the condition is a slow degeneration of natural clearance mechanisms, such as the filtration performed by the choroid plexus, or the more recently investigated peristaltic passage of fluid out of the brain by other channels.

For example > 40 percent of the astronauts who lived on the International Space Station suffered some sort of damage to their eyes, including optic disc edema, globe flattening, and folds in the choroid, the blood-filled layer between the retina and the white sclera.

Thus a focus on amyloid and tau, and immunotherapies to clear them, and dysfunctions in cerebrospinal fluid clearance mechanisms, with approaches ranging from simple mechanical adjustment of fluid drainage channels behind the nose to proposed stem cell therapies for the choroid plexus to addressing immunosenescence in the brain's immune system.

The choroid layer behind the retina gets slightly thinner when we look at dark details on a bright background, and slightly thicker when we look at bright details on a dark background, and somehow this causes an opposite effect in the overall eye growth over time.

An arbitrary "correction" of two diopters is within the margin of error of the possibility of initial overcorrection, choroid changes, inherent small variability in eye tests, and tricking yourself into believing your vision is better than it is.