chords

For chords you really can't model all possible combinations (2^88 for midi) naively, and you also can't really model notes independently - chords are highly structured and follow specific rules!

It appears as a keyboard for typing and a wireless serial port for updating the mappings between chords and keys.

And, in the most basic cases, it doesn't offer much more than simply calling out the chords over the lyrics.

In this case, an RNN meant for 1-of-K output is not well suited to outputting chords.

The second may only be able play the open chords, but write truly wonderful songs.

Being familiar with chords/scales allows you to think about music at a higher abstraction level.

For someone who knows the basics, just seeing the chords goes a long way.

I've only learned a few chords and bought a cheap one off Amazon, but it is simply wonderful.

I imagine that an effective alarm would be a recording of a blood-curdling scream and loud, random, dissonant chords.

Even bounding to only chords of up to 3 or 4 notes still makes a pretty large output space, which means more training data is needed, it is harder to optimize, etc.

When you switch away from the tab, Chrome reduces the play speed, which is why it sounded different and like slowly banged out minor chords.

This is very, very limited a anything busier than a few block chords - which includes a lot of music - will be too dense for it.

This is probably closest to melodic sight-"singing" (you can use a midi instrument too) which is randomly generated melodic sequences, although it's aimed at singers so no chords.

"We are currently working on a much more interesting set of training melodies and chords".

I think this is pretty insightful, especially since many web sites have already started to go down this road: one example is ultimate-guitar.com, usually the top Google result when searching "<song title> chords".