chemicals

For example, Robert Boyle's The Sceptical Chymist, which argued that chemicals were composed of atoms, was published in 1661.

The effects these pharmacologically active chemicals have may help some things, and make other things worse.

Mmm, Well, I believe that one can prove that these chemicals aren't absorbed by the human digestive tract.

Reference chemicals are sold in sub gram amounts because they are not being consumed.

The second, most important - that stuff is flooded with strong chemicals to avoid perishing until it reaches the pet food manufacturer.

The limiting factor right now might be ordering necessary chemicals/cultures but those too are soon to be easy to manufacture at home.

There are plenty of industries in which Germany is ascendent (automotive, biotech, chemicals) which have no more lax information security requirements than computing.

It is very doable, we've successfully done it in the past with other chemicals such as ozone.

This sheds light on behavior such as 'autocatalytic sets': sets of chemicals that can catalyse their own production, which is a necessary condition of life.

Think heavy metals, intermediates and a lot of mystery chemicals.

I've been around enough to reject the notion that an amalgamation of 1001 chemicals is fundamentally different from an amalgamation of 1000.

Cannabis has a number of plausibly pharmacologically active chemicals.

They don't actually release the raw chemicals of "Apple Cider", but they instead release a mix which approximates it.

I mean, wouldn't you call bullshit if I said, "Maybe if the US had stronger privacy laws Europe wouldn't be dominant in the chemicals industry..."

I think this interesting to study the functions of the ribosomes, but the "Custom Chemicals" part is misleading.

You don't say "but everything is made of chemicals.

Chemicals can be hard to manufacture and difficult to distribute.