armchair

While the peloton is undoubtedly not clean, I'm very, very sceptical of this kind of power analysis and modelling by armchair experts.

Obviously no democracy is perfectly ideal, but your armchair analysis hasn't exactly blown a hole in modern governing theory.

The hysteria that armchair power analysis 'experts' and irresponsible pundits have whipped up is disgraceful.

So, just pick a language that feels natural for solving the problem and don't get too distracted by armchair PL philosophers;).

This is the kind of armchair comment that misunderstands how Silicon Valley works.

Although this is armchair quarterbacking, having the F-16 break off the approach to climb and maintain a new altitude would have been nice.

I'm just an armchair social psychologist but I feel like your branding should be far more discrete.

But I'm always very sceptical of armchair power analysis as evidence of doping, no matter how interesting it is.

I'm a little perplexed at how this device seems to generate such strong opinions and armchair quarterbacking.

This is at best incomplete, armchair science, and at worst dangerous.

It's amazing what they've accomplished so far, and I hate to criticize anything this awesome from the comfort of my armchair.

For some reason armchair philosophers seem to find it fascinating, but it fundamentally misses the point has largely been ignored in modern times for good reason.

Well for one thing the armchair airwar blog...er..."experts" keep pretending that with modern, portable anti-aircraft systems the A-10 is a survivable platform long term.

Conquer Cravings, Retrain Your Fat Cells, and Lose Weight Permanently.”" Armchair dieticians?

With this interpretation it is an extremely reasonable provision and should not concern any company involved in normal business." The amount of bad armchair lawyering here is saddening:) Why do people need to go on impressions?

Armchair dieticians in post an this thread.