adsense

If you want to make more expensive content, it will be hard to make money using AdSense, because AdSense does not take into account the quality of your content.

As a friend of mine said, this is to cloud computing as adsense was to online advertising: i.e.

But unfortunately, that nowadays results in a maze of repetitive e-commerce pablum sites, many running AdSense ads.

Standard AdSense text ads are ugly and add so much clutter to the page because of the added text.

Google would charge 10-15 bucks or whatever the average web user is worth in gooogle adsense.

The average uncached weight of an article is 1.1 MB, of which 70% is Google Adsense and Facebook (the only two 3rd party scripts I include).

While it may have changed Google is pretty strict on publishing Adsense income with traffic figures.

Ads on the web are often trying to trick someone into something, outside our world of geeky blogs w/ unobtrusive adsense.

In fact, I'm going to use geolocation to not include Adsense in countries where I earn nothing.

They're trying to be useful, but the busy, cramped, SEO- and AdSense-optimized layout makes its excerpting/summarization of other reviews very hard to trust.

Isn't it reasonable to assume most users already have a CDN version of adsense and facebook cached since 90% of all websites use it?

I think ConsumerSearch, as a made-for-AdSense, made-for-referral-revenue site, is part of the problem Kedrosky is highlighting.

So this won't help any websites which already use "excessive" ads as they aren't (or shouldn't be) using adsense, but instead are using more invasive networks.

Outside of Adsense, the great majority of ads I see are ugly Flash banners advertising weight-loss treatments with dubiously verified effectiveness.