abcs

The fact is that many ABCs (not all) cannot speak anywhere near this level, hence the comments.

There are two or three issues for type unions, atleast two issues for ABCs, and so on.

It comes with a neat moral clarity that is lost when you have to consider that DEFs treat ABCs similarly in analogous situations.

That's a common refrain that many ABCs would concede whenever hearing any non-Chinese-ethnicity speaking Mandarin (or related language) much better than they would.

You can statically check python with types now (pycharm pysonar2 etc), and you can use things like ABCs and interfaces to enforce constraints.

It looks similarily therapeutic...maybe a device to help stroke victims re-remember their ABCs.

Maybe if the builtins were treated as the corresponding abcs.

In New England and most of the NE, exits are numbered consecutively, or at least started that way until ABCs got added in and others got removed.

ABCs and their interaction with build-up of greenhouse gases significantly affect the regional climate, hydrological cycle, glacial melting, agriculture production, ecosystem and human health.

(Yes, we know many DC schools have serious problems.) Some of them didn't know their ABCs, had trouble with numbers, and couldn't even write their own names.

No, Han unification is not conceptually different from unifying ABCs used by English and Spanish speakers, Cyrillic used by Russians or Serbs, etc., except that there are many more characters, so the boundary between what should be unified and what shouldn't contains more items in the gray zone to cause debate.

It's always easier to pitch it as "Those ABCs are mean to us DEFs".

Also, comparisons like "different ABCs for English and Spanish" are spurious and unhelpful.

If you somehow ended up writing "color" with both 'o' characters from the Spanish ABCs and the others from the English ABCs, you'd have a real mess when it came to sorting, searching, name matching (what language is "Hans"?) etc.