winners

Loyal to the winners, helping the winners dominate.

Adjusting the rules regulating markets sounds a lot like governments picking winners, which they are notoriously bad at.

But the investor can't see into the future to figure out which are the 2 winners.

The English Scrabble championships have also included a few Thai winners who barely speak English.

All the arts have brutal power law income distributions, with a handful of winners making $$$$$ while most people don't break even.

As far as 'more regulation' -- I don't like the idea of the government picking winners and losers.

Then, depending on whether it works or not, either evenly distribute proceeds to everyone or return the money to the auction winners.

I don't know, gov rules and regs are unclear and create this type of divisiveness, winners & losers, etc.

I doubt there are many physics Nobel winners who didn't use up a lot of chalk, or pencil, or ink.

They provide entertainment value sometimes, and for winners they provide monetary value.

From the sidebar: >If you're a winner please email winners@calacanis.com The more I read the more I hate this person.

And in any case, these are only the top 10 winners.

And its fair to say "gee Chuck but yeah looking back its easy to see companies that did well, what about these days?" and the answer is really that you only know by looking backward, if you could predict the winners the world wouldn't work quite the way it does.

I hit shots that would have been winners on the women's tour and he got to them easily." We're talking about two women here who ended up nr 1 players in the world (in fact Serena is the nr 1 right now, today), and were already top 10 players at that time.