wares

Google could raise prices on AdWords across the board and advertisers would have plenty of alternative means through which to hawk their wares.

[1] The exception is when researchers need to sell their wares to funding bodies and the media.

It's just that Microsoft seems to spend more money promoting their wares than properly checking and securing them.

So they hijacked an entire C block because they hard coded IP addresses into their wares.

In Windows game development you've have a long history of many ways to distribute your wares, with different pros and cons.

The theme for all the situations is the same -- they already have your eyeballs tuned in to their wares to some extent -- so they try to take advantage of it.

With produce, you can go to the store, and feel and sniff the wares.

It's probably so Paypal can legally rehost imagery used by sellers when showing customers a page to pay for a seller's wares.

Regardless, if wares are acquired and used without charge then the impact on producers and the price expectations of consumers is the same.

I think it's super attractive to new businesses to push their wares via a generous free plan.

Turns out, bn.com operates not just to sell B&N wares, but also apparently as a sort of hub for third-party sellers, (just?) like Amazon.

Even worse: the social graph mining derived suggestion systems that recommend wares based on the bad taste of my friends instead of my bad taste.

"Offline ebay for pirates" suggests to me an auction house to sell stolen wares, but this isn't what the article is about at all.

Surely nobody ever thought of "carefully selecting" their wares, before Gemnote.

As for the third, "Microsoft seems to spend more money promoting their wares than properly checking and securing them", it's an impression and, as such, subjective.

"More money promoting their wares than properly securing them".