trusting

If it breaks your phone, then users are going to stop trusting you as a manufacturer / carrier.

Any trusting of the other party (client trusting the server to not abuse information collected, server trusting client to also fetch and display ads from third-parties) is going to be imperfect.

It only takes being confused once to stop giving a shit what they are writing and never trusting them again.

My impression is that it was once a very good newspaper, and the inertia of that keeps most people trusting it.

Likewise, you have the other problem, which is trusting the data in the first place.

This is exactly correct, and it's why I prefer trusting Google with my data over anyone else.

You're trusting your livelihood to the idea that other people won't willfully misinterpret innocent phrasing on your part for their 2 minutes outrage.

It is like a litmus test for me to decide about continuing to use the website and trusting them with more of my data.

It's more like trusting your reader than the PDF file itself.

And trusting is all the problem there is.

I am certainly not the one doing any trusting right now.

Now since we are trusting a third-party, why can't we simply use bitcoin and even let the decision script be hosted on the third party?

Trusting closed-source applications over open-source sounds odd.