tokio

More likely it's because the container which fell off the Tokio Express had a large number of nautical kits.

Add tokio as a dependency and you'll get well over 100 packages added to your project.

As long as Tokio developers' expertise and testing culture go into Prost, it is not a big deal to have multiple packages.

For example, Tokio project maintains another popular library called Prost for Protobufs.

The GPS coordinates seem to indicate that Tokio has one, too.

It should be simple to build a serde or a tokio.

In my option the dependency problem exists with or without tokio.

If you have already read that, what my post can give you are links to tokio's source code where they implement this waiter queue for their mutex.

In one case, I managed to embed a rickrolling flash ad in a certain Tokio Hotel Fansite, belonging to a critic of our efforts.

I’m assuming you’re referring to an async runtime like tokio.

Even side stepping that tokio no longer pulls multiple packages, it used to be split into multiple packages, in the same way that KDE in Rust would be hundreds of packages.

I'm not aware of eBPF-based dynamic instrumentation for either tokio or other async runtimes, but I'm also not (in need to be) debugging this on a daily basis.

Also so even if it takes some time across ISO working processes, there is still a goal to have some capabilities on the standard library, that in Rust's case means "use tokio" instead.

I would also argue that Rust failed to cancel a Future too, considering I came from a C++ and C# background where I know a lot more about async/await and the missing of "cancellation token" in Tokio is so infuriating.

Tokio in Rust) but none of them have felt quite as natural to me as core.async.

Wikipedia says it's the second market in the world, after Tokio, for fish and seafood.

For example what happens if I use a different async backend like Tokio?