timeline

Moving up the timeline is meaningless toy story was 20 years old so the point is game year x ~= movie x - y.

It's interesting that the OP has built in a feature to add events/milestones to each startup's timeline.

Maybe an action that is very good, averaged over all possible futures, is very bad in our actual timeline?

Tell them, in very frank terms, about the technical debt and demand a reasonable timeline.

The timeline is dead, none of my friends really post much anymore, the primary reason people I know still use it is because of the ubiquitous messenger presence.

There is no timeline where Uber could be justified as being 5 years old.

Give yourself a timeline into which both your vision and sys admin fit 4.

Most venture funds aren't set up for the current timeline to liquidity (I'm sure to VC's chagrin).

With the big vision, start working small - create small daily tasks which will slowly but surely get you there within your timeline.

I respect the point you are making, yet must point out that all it does is establish a timeline.

What matters is whether they made financial gain from employing DRM, and, if so, whether that impacted their timeline and dedication to removing it.

Write all this down as you are listening to the track, along with a timeline of when the different elements come in and out.

AND this is all after me having disabled the "show birthday on timeline" and enabling every other privacy setting there was.

"Why would Steve Jobs write a letter about DRM at all if Apple secretly wanted to keep DRM?" That's where I thought the timeline was interesting.

From the article: > The massive Google+ launch effort had all the hallmarks of a technology corporation: a code name ("Emerald Sea"), an artificial timeline (100 days to launch!), a dedicated secret building ( with the CEO relocated there ) and a full PR blitz once completed.