phenomenology

But even if that prediction is right, our guesstimate of the phenomenology is all wrong.

Welles' F for Fake is practically a treatise on phenomenology, and it's nearly all in the present tense.

So it could well be that the same external phenomenology is present in two quite different conditions.

String phenomenology, that is the study of String theory with the purpose of making low energy predictions is still in its infancy.

Design has more to do with phenomenology than technology, and probably always will.

For the purpose of this article, classical physics explains the phenomenology just fine.

Obviously it's nonsense to say the phenomenology of the mind is not real: that would be like saying we see the stick in the water as straight, when we manifestly don't.

For particle physics phenomenology, that's essentially what the field is, people developing physical models and predicting what would be observed due to such models in other experiments...since it's not exactly easy to perform particle physics experiments.

Honestly, I checked Alan Kay's philosophical reading list, and its depth in phenomenology and developmental psychology was stuff I covered in college.

Like sat down, with a pre-existing understanding of the fields he is interfacing with (particularly phenomenology and structuralism and semiotics a la Saussure) and then begin reading?

I think in practice some of your guesses about notifications and interruption are proving wrong for most people because of the phenomenology of the Taptic engine.

I highly recommend the book _The Antipodes of the Mind: Charting the Phenomenology of the Ayahuasca Experience_ for those interested in serious scholarly research about Ayahuasca and its subjective effects.

If you're reading philosophy and all of a sudden the word "phenomenology" comes up...

We currently have a "lumped model" of addiction, which associates certain additional features with the phenomenology we use to assign something to the category.

To put it romantically: I was completely free." For me personally, this makes me think that the phenomenology of selfhood is very much dependent on perception and others.

When I studied physics as an undergrad, I was made to take a course in experimental particle physics (in Germany they call this "Phenomenology", not in English to my knowledge).

Phenomenology is definitely not the same thing as high energy particle physics, its a very small subset of hep.

Phenomenology deals with this Subject/Object paradox our thoughts/language/science revolves around, and how it comes up short it describing some phenomena.