stronger

Really, an armbar is just a contest of strength and being 50%-100% stronger lets you brute force out of it?

Saying it more plainly, just because men are naturally stronger than women, doesn't mean that men are naturally better fighters.

So your theory is that men are not almost always substantially stronger than women pound for pound?

Pound for pound, top male fighters are going to be between 50% and 100% stronger than Ronda.

In MMA it's not even interesting as men are way stronger, have better hand-eye coordination and way less body fat.

Her ability to grapple with a comparable top-ranked male fighter that is even just 1/3 stronger would be very problematic.

A comparison of Olympic weightlifting records in comparable weight classes suggests men are around 30% stronger at the same weight.

No, men are stronger at the exact same weight than women are, by a significant margin.

Men and women are in fact very different in the strength department, men are vastly stronger.

Pound for pound, an untrained man will be about 50% stronger than an untrained woman.

The bias that men tend to be physically stronger than women, pound for pound?

The stronger you are, the more tiny mistakes you can make before you end up in a position where they can't get out.

The problem with saying "men are stronger than women" is that we're not dealing with men and women, we're dealing with a specific woman, and a potential specific man.