sportswear

They have separate brands for low/medium/high-end clothing stores (Old Navy, Gap, and Banana Republic) and Athleta for sportswear.

Consider Nike or Addidas so you can give more credible shoes;-) Sportswear sponsoring should also be considered.

It's an actual logo from a sportswear brand that was popular in the US in the 90s.

Nike sells sneakers and sportswear but people buy the hope and tools for better athletic performance.

Some want to carry X sportswear with prominent branding, others take pride in high-price tag items without any explicit branding.

It doesn't happen on cotton but it happens mostly on the 100% polyester athletic clothing (which is the majority of all sportswear).

Like I was spending an hour or more just to change into sportswear, shower afterwards, and switch back.

I like the Nike ads, so on the occasions when I buy sportswear, I have positive feelings about Nike stuff.

We build unique consumer experiences for our major sportswear client.

Also, we could have processed orders through a network of tailors, but most tailors do not have patterns for sportswear, including polo shirts.

We are looking at going after the sportswear category.

Because of that, a number of the women’s shirts Columbia Sportswear makes are intentionally designed with tiny pockets near the waistline, which lowers the cost of importing them.

I spend 100-10000x more on stuff that isn't sportswear, but I think Nike gets more value from me watching that ad than anyone who advertises some "relevant" SaaS product or whatnot.

Have done work for Intel, VMware, Columbia Sportswear...and worked at a startup in NYC for 3+ years.

I think your observations are partially right - there are the usual suspects: Nike, Mentor Graphics, Columbia Sportswear, Intel, etc...