socks

On the other hand, most modern mathematicians know stuff that would blow Whittaker and Watson's socks off.

There's a robot that can take a pair of socks and determine if one is inside out and if so invert it.

There they are not allowed amenities like fresh socks or telephone calls unless they work for them at the rate of $0.13/hr.

Proxying over socks (-D) or every individual website (-L) becomes rather tiresome.

Imagine you could only wear blue socks on land you own, but anywhere else you'd need to pay $250k for permission to wear them.

Apple socks away billions while developers get nothing or very little.

Not all programs will be able to do socks proxies but most can do http proxies - http/1.1 over nc can use a http proxy!

Recently I wasn't sure whether it would be OK to wear black socks with shorts.

Some examples of the businesses: There was one store devoted entirely (I think) to socks.

But recently I tried it again and had my socks blown off!

I'd much prefer to buy stuff like socks and underwear online, but it ends up being cheaper to just catch a sale at Macy's.

Needless to say: wear long socks and have someone else completely check all of your limbs and back under bright light and magnification for those very tiny deer ticks.

Crow's rose grows some." Love reading "Fox in Socks" to my kids.

Compare to: "In 2014, the city allowed people to wear green socks" If you want to transport people for a fee, what rational, moral justification is there for anyone to intervene in that?